Background: Contaminated blood cultures result in unnecessary antibiotic use, increased length of stay, and additional laboratory tests, all of which increase healthcare costs. While the optimal skin antisepsis agent for reducing blood culture contamination is not known, the cost of various agents differs substantially.
Objective: To determine the relative rates of blood culture
contamination for 3 skin antisepsis interventions – 10% povidone
iodine aqueous solution (PI), 2% iodine tincture (IT) and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl
alcohol (
Methods: We employed
a randomized cluster design using hospital floor as the unit of randomization,
skin antisepsis agent as the intervention variable, and rate of contaminated
blood cultures as the primary outcome. Each
antisepsis intervention was used for 5 months (PI x 5 months, IT x 5 months,
Results: A total of 12,968 peripheral blood culture sets
were evaluated over 15 months, of which 740 (5.7%) were positive. There were 101 contaminated cultures which
represented 13.6% of all positive cultures. Predominant organisms in
contaminated cultures were coagulase negative
staphylococcus (76.2%), micrococcus (8.9%), and Bacillus species (6.9%). The
intention to treat rates of contaminated blood cultures were similar among the
3 antiseptics (p=0.22), with 0.60% with PI (95% CI, 0.39-0.88), 0.80% with IT
(95% CI, 0.55-1.11), and 0.93% with
Conclusions: The rate of contaminated blood cultures obtained by peripheral venipuncture did not vary significantly with antiseptic agent. The choice of antiseptic agent does not appear to impact contamination rate when blood cultures are obtained by a dedicated phlebotomy team, and perhaps should be based instead on economic considerations. To this end, PI appears to be the current agent of choice given that its acquisition cost was the lowest of the 3 agents investigated.