110 Surveillance of antibiotic use in a hospital

Friday, March 19, 2010
Grand Hall (Hyatt Regency Atlanta)
P.J. van den Broek, MD, PhD , Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
I. M. Teepe - Twiss, PhD , Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
Background: the antibiotic committee of a hospital sets rules for the use of antibiotics. For adequate quality control the committee needs feedback about the adherence to her guidelines. We developed computerized surveillance of antibiotic use in our hospital.

Objective: to have a feedback tool about adherence to the antibiotic policy of the hospital with the purpose to adept the policy when this was to the point or improve adherence when necessary.

Methods: the hospital uses a computerized prescription system for medication (medicator). The antibiotic committee has indicated a number of antibiotics as not free for prescription. This means that the prescriber has to fill in a motivation explaining why he chooses the antibiotic in question in this case. The motivations are judged by a small group of assessors, specialists in microbiology and infectious diseases, using the following classifications: correct, incorrect regarding indication for treatment, choice or dosage according to antibiotic policy, and unsatisfactory information for judgment. Twice a year the antibiotic committee makes reports for the heads of departments to give them feedback about prescription practices of their staff. Once yearly a report is made showing the heads of departments how they perform in comparison with the others.

Results: the results are summarized in the table. The surveillance started in 2005. The number of departments increased gradually explaining the increase in reports and (assessed) prescriptions. The most frequent reasons for unsatisfactory information are referring to the advice of another specialist and not giving the weight of the patients for drugs that are dosed on body weight. The percentage of correct prescriptions gradually increased. The percentage of incorrect prescriptions stayed around one third of the prescriptions. The surveillance led to a number of specific actions of the antibiotic committee, e.g. adaption of the guideline of antibiotic prophylaxis after removal of a urinary catheter, correction of overdosing of children weighing 40 kg or more by pediatricians, stopping the pre-operative administration of mupirocine to all cardiac surgery patients, adaptation of the guideline for treatment of granulocytopenic children, discussing the overuse of chinolones and co-amoxiclav with departments that use these antibiotics incorrectly.  
2005
 2006
 2007
 2008
 
 number
%
number
%
number
%
number
%
Reports
8
 33
 48
 48
 
Prescriptions
  4816
 7977
 7886
 
Assessments
1488
 3680
76
4959
62
5924
75
Correct
610
41
1703
46
2232
45
3119
53
Incorrect
664
45
1030
28
1734
35
1801
30
Unsatisfactory information
214
14
947
26
993
20
1004
17

Conclusions: the surveillance system for antibiotic use proved to be a valuable tool for the antibiotic committee that guides the activities of the committee to promote prudent use of antibiotics.