Objective: Our goals were to decrease inappropriate use of antibiotics, optimize antibiotic use, decrease nosocomial acquisition of antibiotic resistant bacterial infections or colonization and decrease Clostridium difficile diarrhea cases. In addition our goal was to decrease antimicrobial costs and provide more cost effective care.
Methods: The AMT program allows providers to order restricted antibiotics, according to our hospital guidelines, without upfront approval. But a retrospective chart review is done the following day, M-F, by a dedicated Pharm D and a M.D. with infectious disease expertise. Formal written recommendations are placed in the electronic medical record as an AMT note. Our previous restricted antibiotic program required the prescribing provider to get approval to use a restricted antibiotic from the on call ID doctor prior to use. Despite this we still saw inappropriate utilization and increasing costs. We planned to compare the outcome of the new AMT program to the old system.
Results:
Antimicrobial Agents Activity | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 |
Antimicrobial Agents Total Costs | $5,712,589 | $4,954,776 | $4,841,578 | $4,369,983 |
Total Patient Days | 96,791 | 95,709 | 98,910 | 99, 090 |
Antimicrobial Agents Costs per Patient Day | $59.02 | $51.77 | $48.95 | $44.37 |
Change | - | $7.25 | $2.82 | $4.58 |
The total cost saving for the first two years of the program is $732,758. Costs savings has been impacted by drug contracting as well as a decrease in overall utilization.
AMT Interventions:
Totals 2007 | Totals 2008 | |
# Patients | 1143 | 1276 |
# Interventions | 1991 | 2165 |
Accepts | 1153 (57.9%) | 1298 (60%) |
Agree w/ Management | 370 (18.6%) | 407 (18.8%) |
Declines | 468 (23.5%) | 460 (21.2%) |
Conclusions:
Despite good acceptance of the AMT recommendations, reduced antibiotic use and significant cost saving we have not been able to show a consistent decrease in number of patients with hospital acquired (HA) antibiotic resistant bacteria.