Objective: Survey opinions of colorectal surgeons in the region regarding their practice and opinions of MBP. We also sought to compare results from DMC to other hospitals.
Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to colorectal surgeons via email. The survey consisted of 10 closed questions and additional space where participants could add comments.
Results: Results are shown in Table. Of the twenty surgeons who responded, 13 (65%) practiced at DMC. Overall, only 10 (50%) of the surgeons felt that
Conclusions: Most colorectal surgeons in Southeastern Michigan recognized that good data exist supporting stopping the routine use of antibiotics for
Survey question | Agree (total cohort, n=20) | Agree (DMC, n=13) | Agree (non-DMC, n=7) |
MBP, including both antibacterial and non-antibacterial components, are unnecessary | 10 (50%) | 8 (62%) | 2 (28%) |
I think antibiotics are an important part of MBP | 5 (25%) | 2 (15%) | 3 (43%) |
Current data questioning the role of antibiotics in MBP is scientifically valid | 19 (95%) | 13 (100%) | 6 (86%) |
I do not routinely use antibiotics for MBP | 16 (80%) | 12 (92%) | 4 (57%) |
I am considering stopping routine use of antibiotics for MBP in the near future | 13 (65%) | 11 (85%) | 2 (29%) |
Hospital guidelines should state that it is not advisable to routinely use antibiotics for MBP | 12 (60%) | 10 (77%) | 2 (28%) |
Antibiotics in MBP have important roles in addition to antibacterial activity (such as motility and immuno-modulating effects) | 3 (15%) | 1 (8%) | 2 (28%) |
Antibiotics in MBP increases the risk for infections caused by resistant organisms | 7 (35%) | 6 (46%) | 1 (14%) |
Use of antibiotics in MBP reduces the risk for infectious complications following colorectal surgery | 5 (25%) | 2 (15%) | 3 (43%) |
If I stopped using antibiotics for MBP I would be concerned about potential legal repercussions | 5 (25%) | 4 (31%) | 1 (14%) |