Objective: To assess risk factors for DRSP, antimicrobial choices, and clinical outcomes in patients with outpatient CAP in relation to IDSA guideline recommendations.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults discharged from our emergency department or urgent care center with a primary ICD-9 diagnosis of pneumonia from April 2009 through October 2009. Analyses were stratified according to the presence of risk factors for DRSP as specified in the IDSA guideline. Outcomes including treatment failure, recurrent infection, hospitalization for pulmonary infection, and mortality were assessed during a 30-day follow-up period.
Results: 175 patients were treated for pneumonia; however, only 114 (65%) met objective criteria for CAP. Of the 175 patients, current tobacco use (79, 42%), asthma (28, 16%), alcohol abuse (24, 14%), diabetes mellitus (18, 10%), use of a proton pump inhibitor (20, 11%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (16, 9%) were the most common risk factors for pneumonia. 68 (39%) patients met at least one criteria for DRSP, most commonly COPD (16, 9%), alcohol abuse (24, 14%), diabetes mellitus (18, 10%), and antibiotic usage within 90 days (15, 9%). There were no significant differences in antimicrobial choices for patients with and without risk factors for DRSP (table).
Antimicrobial choice |
No risk for DRSP n = 107 |
Risk factor for DRSP present n = 68 |
P |
Azithromycin |
68 (64%) |
36 (53%) |
0.16 |
Doxycycline |
29 (27%) |
19 (28%) |
0.90 |
Levofloxacin |
9 (8%) |
9 (13%) |
0.31 |
β-lactam |
2 (2%) |
2 (3%) |
0.64 |
Other |
0 (0%) |
3 (4%) |
0.06 |
Nine (5%) patients experienced treatment failure (5, 3%) or recurrence of infection (5, 3%). Severe adverse events including hospitalization for pulmonary infection (2, 2% vs. 4, 6%, p = 0.21) and death (0, 0% vs. 0, 0%) were uncommon in patients with and without risk factors for DRSP, respectively.
Conclusions: Risk factors for DRSP in patients treated for outpatient CAP are common; however, the presence of these risk factors did not significantly alter antimicrobial choices. Despite this, severe adverse outcomes were uncommon. Whether the use of fluoroquinolones is justified by improved outcomes is an important question that requires further study.